|
Nomic
Feb 18, 2008 17:25:59 GMT -6
Post by Erniewan on Feb 18, 2008 17:25:59 GMT -6
I suppose since it will happen anyways, it's a waste. Unvote. So does Caleton try a new rule or do we wait for everyone to vote?
|
|
|
Nomic
Feb 18, 2008 17:40:41 GMT -6
Post by Cormac on Feb 18, 2008 17:40:41 GMT -6
OH WAIT, we keep going. I make the next rule now, but Caleton's rule can still be voted on, until everyone votes for or against it, or in the case it has been 2 cycles of the list of players, just a majority for it or against it.
I propose that should all player but one vote for it, anyone person can be removed from the game.
So now, the next person alphabetically may make a rule, and we can vote on my rule and Caletons.
|
|
|
Nomic
Feb 18, 2008 18:24:12 GMT -6
Post by Caleton on Feb 18, 2008 18:24:12 GMT -6
where do we keep track of points and new rules? the first post?
and I don't really get your rule. so I disagree for now.
|
|
|
Nomic
Feb 18, 2008 18:51:06 GMT -6
Post by Cormac on Feb 18, 2008 18:51:06 GMT -6
Yes.
And basically, my rule is that we can lynch people, like mafia.
|
|
|
Nomic
Feb 18, 2008 22:02:07 GMT -6
Post by Jerzkong on Feb 18, 2008 22:02:07 GMT -6
I vote against that rule.... this game is meant to be point-based, not lynching.... wouldn't that make the game shorter and thus defeat the purpose of this game?
|
|
|
Nomic
Feb 18, 2008 23:32:36 GMT -6
Post by redearth on Feb 18, 2008 23:32:36 GMT -6
Can you please reword your rule... its hard to understand.. and who's after cormac?
|
|
|
Nomic
Feb 19, 2008 1:37:26 GMT -6
Post by Jerzkong on Feb 19, 2008 1:37:26 GMT -6
I think Ernie.
|
|
|
Nomic
Feb 19, 2008 12:14:31 GMT -6
Post by Erniewan on Feb 19, 2008 12:14:31 GMT -6
I also oppose the rule, then people would lynch those who are about to win. So can I propose a rule now, or do I wait until those two are voted for?
|
|
|
Nomic
Feb 19, 2008 14:08:14 GMT -6
Post by redearth on Feb 19, 2008 14:08:14 GMT -6
just go..
|
|
|
Nomic
Feb 19, 2008 16:26:39 GMT -6
Post by Cormac on Feb 19, 2008 16:26:39 GMT -6
Keep going, you can still vote on those two still. And guys, we kind of don't want anyone else winning hence my rule =P
|
|
|
Nomic
Feb 19, 2008 20:30:08 GMT -6
Post by Erniewan on Feb 19, 2008 20:30:08 GMT -6
Ok, as a better version of your proposal, I propose that if anybody gets more than 30 points ahead of the second place person, they automatically lose those 30 points.
That way no one can get far ahead, and it keeps the tension in the game up.
And I don't want anybody lynching me if I'm about to win. Hence my opposition.
Btw, are we going to 100 or 200 points?
|
|
|
Nomic
Feb 19, 2008 21:02:47 GMT -6
Post by Cormac on Feb 19, 2008 21:02:47 GMT -6
200, since it's an internet game
AND I VOTE FOR THAT RULE
|
|
|
Nomic
Feb 19, 2008 21:56:32 GMT -6
Post by Caleton on Feb 19, 2008 21:56:32 GMT -6
I agree!
|
|
|
Nomic
Feb 20, 2008 0:14:57 GMT -6
Post by Jerzkong on Feb 20, 2008 0:14:57 GMT -6
I agree. That is a good rule.
|
|
|
Nomic
Feb 20, 2008 0:41:09 GMT -6
Post by redearth on Feb 20, 2008 0:41:09 GMT -6
Agree.. nice rule.. keeps the tension seeping..
|
|
owlknight
Green Belt
[M:3250]
They may look safe, but when your alone they will eat you.
Posts: 515
|
Nomic
Feb 20, 2008 18:13:15 GMT -6
Post by owlknight on Feb 20, 2008 18:13:15 GMT -6
uhh...whats going on?
|
|
|
Nomic
Feb 20, 2008 18:27:20 GMT -6
Post by Hellfire on Feb 20, 2008 18:27:20 GMT -6
I agree with Ernie's rule.
|
|
|
Nomic
Feb 20, 2008 23:08:05 GMT -6
Post by redearth on Feb 20, 2008 23:08:05 GMT -6
simple majority.. is present here.. (I think).. we have a new rule.. next... in the line for rule making is ?? I believe its me as my last name begins with an F.... if so.. just lemme know.. and I'll whip out a rule..
|
|
|
Nomic
Feb 20, 2008 23:46:24 GMT -6
Post by Caleton on Feb 20, 2008 23:46:24 GMT -6
Redearth, you are mistaken. My rule was to make it so you only needed majority. Right now, you need everyone to vote yes to make it official. I think that is dumb which is why everyone should vote for my rule.
|
|
|
Nomic
Feb 21, 2008 1:30:25 GMT -6
Post by redearth on Feb 21, 2008 1:30:25 GMT -6
I thought the rules said you need a simple majority.. ??
|
|
|
Nomic
Feb 21, 2008 1:32:28 GMT -6
Post by redearth on Feb 21, 2008 1:32:28 GMT -6
wait.. where did I read that ?? I don't know.. I'll look at it again when I'm more awake..
|
|
|
Nomic
Feb 21, 2008 11:48:42 GMT -6
Post by Jerzkong on Feb 21, 2008 11:48:42 GMT -6
Hey, if we make that rule real, shouldn't we have to state it like:
301: Blah blah blah?
To make it official?
|
|
|
Nomic
Feb 21, 2008 14:27:09 GMT -6
Post by Flipstar on Feb 21, 2008 14:27:09 GMT -6
I agree
|
|
|
Nomic
Feb 21, 2008 21:06:26 GMT -6
Post by redearth on Feb 21, 2008 21:06:26 GMT -6
to ?
|
|
|
Nomic
Feb 22, 2008 20:14:41 GMT -6
Post by Flipstar on Feb 22, 2008 20:14:41 GMT -6
Ernie's rule....
|
|
|
Nomic
Feb 27, 2008 23:26:15 GMT -6
Post by redearth on Feb 27, 2008 23:26:15 GMT -6
ok seeing as no one came forward to say they were before me I will state my proposal.. Rule 303 (?) - All proposals for rules must be made visible to the eye possibly by bolding it. I came up with this as I had a real hard time following which were the rules and had to go through a LOT of stuff before I found the proposals..
|
|
|
Nomic
Feb 28, 2008 2:22:53 GMT -6
Post by Caleton on Feb 28, 2008 2:22:53 GMT -6
I disagree. this one is kinds pointless. but someone needs to keep track of all of the proposals and how many people have disgreed and agreed. i guess i can if no one els volunteers.
|
|
|
Nomic
Feb 28, 2008 2:51:09 GMT -6
Post by redearth on Feb 28, 2008 2:51:09 GMT -6
It is not pointless to me who has no time to spare reading everything.. I think it makes sense ( to me at least).. I agree though wasting a proposal for this might be pointless.. but I feel that this will posiibly help us not be as confused (again I seem to be talkin abt me! )
|
|
|
Nomic
Feb 28, 2008 3:50:08 GMT -6
Post by Erniewan on Feb 28, 2008 3:50:08 GMT -6
How about you just make the rule that Cormac posts Vote Counts and Point totals every other day or so?
|
|
|
Nomic
Feb 28, 2008 14:42:45 GMT -6
Post by Hellfire on Feb 28, 2008 14:42:45 GMT -6
WOW!!! Just skip over me huh?!?!?! k, here's mine. If you just skip over someone else's turn (without giving them a clear warning in the form of a PM or so), you miss a turn. You can't just jump over other people like that without giving them a warning. I didn't come to this thread because I kinda forgot about it.
|
|